Stardust Movie Reviews: Bad Estimation of a Great Fairy Tale

The last decade proves that people are eager to watch fairy tales, and adult tales as well. The Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter are loved by grown-ups. Maybe, there was too little of Charles Perrault in their lives?

There is a mix of Perrault tales, Pirates of the Caribbean, The Lord of the Rings in one and the same film, Stardust.

The majority of Stardust movie reviews are negative. Almost all movie reviews on Stardust criticized this tale for bad story, poor performance, and even not perfect cast. It is a great tale for those who like humor, good special effects and magic. This Stardust movie review proves that via five-point demonstration.

1. Story. Despite the fact that every Stardust movie review fails to understand how good story is you watch it with great interest and want to know what is next. The peripeteias in this film are exciting and unexpected.
2. Characters. Somehow none of Stardust movie reviews notes that those poor princes are so inventive; those evil witches are so touching. Actually, every character in this film is bright and worthy.
3. Cast. Of course, such bright characters are created not only by the screenwriter, but talented actors as well. Some Stardust movie reviews blame Robert De Niro for his poor performance. However, it is poor estimation not performance. All Stardust movie reviews praise Michelle Pfeiffer’s acting. Well, she is really great!
4. Special effects. Stardust movie reviews say almost nothing about special effects in this film which are very nice. They are not even effects, they become little miracles. 
5. Humor. Many Stardust movie reviews say it is a farce or parody which is absolute nonsense. This film is a complete fairy story full of magic and humor. You know that humor can work miracles!